You should delete all the video's or edit them if they have third party (copyrighted) content on it. Networks won't partner you if you have it and they are going to be mad pissed if you lie about it also.

Maker Studios has made an agreement with Universal to make their content (Music) available to its network/sub-networks (Socialblade,RPM, N4Gtv etc.) for remixes only and I currently do not know when they are going to roll it out/

Quick question, and it's probably nothing. I have one video with acknowledged content (from the movie "The Downfall"), and I did an app with RPM to see the results.

Not enough viewers, expected that, and copyrighted videos, expected that too.

But it also said I had strikes against my account. Huh? My account has always been in good standing for over 2 years. I checked and it was still all green. I don't want to delete the video to test this out just yet, but I thought acknowledged third party content and copyright strikes were two separate things.

Not in any rush, just curious.

EDIT: You got 200 subs in a month? WOW! Good job! =)
You're definately not small time and should get partnered pretty easily for all zee perks.

default wrote:

Quick question, and it's probably nothing. I have one video with acknowledged content (from the movie "The Downfall"), and I did an app with RPM to see the results.

Not enough viewers, expected that, and copyrighted videos, expected that too.

But it also said I had strikes against my account. Huh? My account has always been in good standing for over 2 years. I checked and it was still all green. I don't want to delete the video to test this out just yet, but I thought acknowledged third party content and copyright strikes were two separate things.

Not in any rush, just curious.

EDIT: You got 200 subs in a month? WOW! Good job! =)
You're definately not small time and should get partnered pretty easily for all zee perks.

The strikes against your account is just bullshit if you don't have them, RPM tends to spew crap randomly. They refused me due to the fact I didnt use Social Media enough and even all the staff here are wtfing about that.

Thanks kneesocks. I was all like, "Bu...bu.. But I've been a good boy!!"

Err, Naughty Dog is a Gamedeveloper? If you do commentary/let's plays you are fine if you talk over it.

Shikieiki Yamaxanadu wrote:

DanViron wrote:

Third party content is still copyrighted material it depends on the ownership rights of the material ie. using music could be owned by Universal etc. where as film material could be different. I think you get copyright strikes from third party content sometimes, I know that you should always acknowledge using the content unless it is your own (dispute).

Thanks dude I just need to ask permissions from Naughty Dog and figure out how to get a partnership haha.

Err, Naughty Dog is a Gamedeveloper? If you do commentary/let's plays you are fine if you talk over it.

Oh my god dude. Are you serious?! They made Crash Bandicoot!! ND has been around for ages!

default wrote:

Shikieiki Yamaxanadu wrote:

DanViron wrote:

Third party content is still copyrighted material it depends on the ownership rights of the material ie. using music could be owned by Universal etc. where as film material could be different. I think you get copyright strikes from third party content sometimes, I know that you should always acknowledge using the content unless it is your own (dispute).

Thanks dude I just need to ask permissions from Naughty Dog and figure out how to get a partnership haha.

Err, Naughty Dog is a Gamedeveloper? If you do commentary/let's plays you are fine if you talk over it.

Oh my god dude. Are you serious?! They made Crash Bandicoot!! ND has been around for ages!

It was kinda sarcasm, if you make letsplays you don't have to ask the dev/publisher for permission actually.

Shikieiki Yamaxanadu wrote:

It was kinda sarcasm, if you make letsplays you don't have to ask the dev/publisher for permission actually.

But if you are planning to monetize the lets play video/series, you should ask premission from the dev/publisher (assuming you are NOT part of network).

Moneytizing before getting partnered is obsolete and only imo idiots would do so, once you can get a fair amount of money from it , you are already partnered with a network. Its not worth to moneytize some cents for risk.

I sorry to bro but Its unlikely to happen if you have those videos up .

Shikieiki Yamaxanadu wrote:

Tms wrote:

Shikieiki Yamaxanadu wrote:

It was kinda sarcasm, if you make letsplays you don't have to ask the dev/publisher for permission actually.

But if you are planning to monetize the lets play video/series, you should ask premission from the dev/publisher (assuming you are NOT part of network).

Moneytizing before getting partnered is obsolete and only imo idiots would do so, once you can get a fair amount of money from it , you are already partnered with a network. Its not worth to moneytize some cents for risk.

Well its a trap that many seem to fall for, if I didnt stumble across these forums I propably would have been one of them. Warnings are there but easy to miss. But if you do fall for trap you should atleast play safe by getting premissions and suchs so you wont get f*ed over side ways by the trap.

I was just about to make a thread about this, if we could possibly expand a little more into this topic I'd appreciate it.

I just got a notification of one of my videos being matched for third party content. I read the details, my video is "available and playable". But I'm still a little confused.

Your video is available and playable.

Here are the details:

Visual content administered by: THQ at 16:33

The video in question is my first lets play of Saints Row 3, and THQ is
the company with the content claim. It's the very beginning of the game
for me, but the content claim is specified at a point almost halfway
through the video at 16:33.

None of my other Saints Row 3 videos have this notification, and as far as I know they all fall under fair use. Can anyone point out what specifically makes that part of my clip claimed? Should I be disputing? I do want to be able to become a partner sometime down the road.

Have you spotted anything that might have triggered the claim at the specified time? You could try to re-upload the video and tamper a little bit around with it.

Shikieiki Yamaxanadu wrote:

Have you spotted anything that might have triggered the claim at the specified time? You could try to re-upload the video and tamper a little bit around with it.

Well, considering it was a claim by THQ (they made or produced the game in question) I assume it has to do with the scene. But, there are several cutscenes before that one that they could claim.

I WAS playing co-op at the time, and his phone went off. He had a song by an artist that was featured in the game (Benny Banassi), but it isn't the song featured in the game, and it wasn't for more than 4-5 seconds and hardly clear. That is the only thing I can think of that makes that clip different from any other cutscene.

The main things I'm trying to clear up are:
1. My account is all still in good standing even with the content ID claim. What does this mean for future partner prospects? Can I still get a partnership with this?

2.Does this seem disputable? It is technically their content, but they aren't claiming a copyright infringement. It should fall under fair use, and the details of content ID claiming are somewhat vague.

Anything to help clear up those two points would put me at ease, I have not acknowledged nor disputed to claim yet.

Hi guys im new to youtube and all this is confusing, someone plz explain it simpler

If you know nothing about YouTube, then you shouldn't make videos until you do.