I only played with nvidia cards so far...it´s normal for me to use it and because I already know nvidia I think I´m not going to buy any other card.									
									
									
								 
 Piggeh Love :love:
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.
The forums have been archived. Please read this thread for more information.
 
 bestbest333 wrote:
...Why wouldn't programming be my thing? It is and will be. And, I wasn't trolling. I don't plan on playing Serious Sam 3, Battlefield 3 or CoD Black Ops 2 (specially CoD). The problem with my other PC was that it wouldn't run ANYTHING that was after 2005. I don't care if this system isn't 100% new (i.e. not the last GPU/CPU that were made as of now); it can run games that I wanted to play, and that aren't made in 2012 (I almost never play new games as they're just perfections of the past, not really inovations). So, yeah..it can run games I want to play. And I mean the games that were before 2010; I can run most of those and I'm happy with it. I may need to change my PC again, as who knows what CPUs/GPUs/Games will come out in the future; but for now, this'll do. I can't see why it would be shitty.
I'm not saying this in offense, but if somebody is wrong about something, that doesn't make that person either a troll or stupid (programming isn't related to hardware, mostly). So, if I was wrong above in some points, that doesn't make me stupid, or somebody that shouldn't touch computers or do programming on them. I don't really care if I was wrong or not above, but the current PC is doing well enough for me. As I said, I don't plan to play CoDs.
And yes, I agree; the Ghz, VRAM and RAM do matter; what I wanted to point out is that they're not the only ones that do matter. And, XP, 2000 > Vista and 7. I can confirm that. Of course, there are some points Windows 7 may be better than XP (for example, compatibility issues), but they're fewer than the advantages 2000 and XP have over Vista and 7.

 
									 
									
