Eh, some sequels can ruin the whole game....

Ib doesn't need a sequel. In my opinion, sequels always screw the story up (But not always. Because Portal 2 was frickin OSM). Like when a game comes out, at the end it says "THE END". But then, a sequel comes out and everybody's like "Whaaaaaat??". Ib was a fantastic game with unexpected things happening, and incredible puzzles. Someone doesn't need to come in and screw it up. Also, Ib has multiple endings. If someone came to one ending, and the sequel started from another ending, the player would be like "Whaaaaaat??".

CONCLUSION: Ib doesn't need a sequel. It's better by itself.

i have not played ib and will not watch pewdie play it until i have


even if it is marvellous i dont think a sequel would be a good idea

a sequel will ruin it for Ib

I just got done recording and playing Ib. I thought it was amazing! Yet, if there was to be a sequel, it should be with all new people with maybe with a cameo appearance of Garry or Ib.

Did you really just bump this?
-.-

I believe he did, TisBen.

And also, I'm not quite sure about a sequel. The ending was fairly clear...to me at least. Besides, the cliff hanger just makes you imagine what happens next It's really what's in your mind that makes you come up with your own ending, after the actual ending...if that makes any sense. I enjoy cliff hangers, it gets you thinking

I'm not sure about sequel, it's a bit risky. And it would have to be with new characters. So I think Ib better stays like this.
Though I'd gladly watch a good anime made of it *is actually preparing a scenario for one*

Actually a sequel could be made(even with that problem with multiple endings) without ruining the story, but i guess it's better this way. Better to keep that mystery.