I think this is low/mid end pc.

A mid/high end will cost you around 800 euro's / dollars.

Hmm idk about the prices in australia, might be a bit more expensive. Might search google for computer prices or check this site:

getprice.com.au/computers.htm

Idk if it;s accurate though.

if you're willing to build then here's the site i used to get my parts - au.pcpartpicker.com/ (australian version)

CPU: It's as good as i7 first gen of Intel. Not bad for a CPU. It has 6 cores. i3 sandy bridge can bring it down on some apps.

GPU: It's as powerful as a GTX 560 Ti.

This is not a low end rig. It can play most games at high without AA at all.
It consumes a lot of electric power though.

Hello,

I am newby here. . Try to visit support.microsoft.com or just visit this site fixmypcfree.com/.

Thanks,

It is actually a very good PC, you have a nice processor, bit old but that's made up for with the 6-core 3.2, I'd say you should definitely upgrade your RAM, I have 16Gb, but I do a lot of video editing, so maybe for you 8Gb would be enough

I have the same processor but oc to 4.2 and just upgrade your RAM and you should be fine.
Graphics should be good enough. will post my dxdiag later this evening

My rig is mid/high that is fairly cheap (i7 isnt needed if you dont render stuff)

I render with an i5, and it works fine, but it is OCd and also 16Gb RAM, the processor is not an issue, just buy a couple of RAM sticks
What motherboard do you have?

470 Graphics Card. That's not too bad but seeing how we're almost at the 700's, I'd say that you could use an upgrade.
Also, only 4GB of RAM. I always recommend 8GB. It helps when multitasking and doesn't slow anything down. If you're rendering/doing videos/graphics, then I recommend pumping it up to 16GB.

Otherwise pretty basic.

Graphics card is pretty good, but your RAM is pretty poor. I'm personally not a fan of AMD processors either, I'd much rather have intel.

Needs more RAM, Dual core/quad core processor.

Decent graphics card are easy enough to come by, but your main issue will be your RAM.

i have had 6 different pc until now.Intel and AMD with ATI or Nvidia graphics...well if you want my opinion choose AMD CPU with Nvidia Graphics that always gives you the best results!specially the new CPU of AMD have a really good price/performance i mean the FX-8350 it's only 200$ and it does what a 3570K i5 do but this 3570K i5 is about 240$ or maybe more.about graphics i don't suggest ATI cuz they have tons of problems with the AMD based mother boards and usually they over heat and the AMD catalyst doesn't work well enough ( have had a 6990 it just kept getting hot like hell!)but even before going all out about this you better think how much you want to pay if you want something good!( i'm not gonna say Mid/High cuz what is mid/high? playing on 4 LCD with tons of fans running like helicopter in your case?that's a high end gaming PC? no that's just a waste of electricity and money!if you are one of those guys just ignore this post!)

Oh god yes, never go ATI with graphics card. Too many problems.

well specially that they don't have shader or Cuda and Nvidia Pshyics don't work well enough on them...for some programs (designing,rendering) you need Shader and Cuda...

Hello friend,

This are my specs, i can run anything in ultra high.


------------------
System Information
------------------
Time of this report: 2/11/2013, 22:39:06
Machine name: P0LT10N-PC
Operating System: Windows 8 Pro with Media Center 64-bit (6.2, Build 9200) (9200.win8_gdr.121119-1606)
Language: Spanish (Regional Setting: Spanish)
System Manufacturer: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd.
System Model: To be filled by O.E.M.
BIOS: BIOS Date: 05/11/12 18:06:23 Ver: 04.06.05
Processor: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz (8 CPUs), ~3.9GHz
Memory: 8192MB RAM
Available OS Memory: 8154MB RAM
Page File: 3927MB used, 8257MB available
Windows Dir: C:\Windows
DirectX Version: DirectX 11
DX Setup Parameters: Not found
User DPI Setting: Using System DPI
System DPI Setting: 96 DPI (100 percent)
DWM DPI Scaling: Disabled
DxDiag Version: 6.02.9200.16384 64bit Unicode


---------------
Display Devices
---------------
Card name: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
Manufacturer: NVIDIA
Chip type: GeForce GTX 680
DAC type: Integrated RAMDAC
Device Type: Full Device
Device Key: Enum\PCI\VEN_10DE&DEV_1180&SUBSYS_26803842&REV_A1
Display Memory: 4042 MB
Dedicated Memory: 1994 MB
Shared Memory: 2047 MB
Current Mode: 1920 x 1080 (32 bit) (60Hz)
Driver Name: nvd3dumx.dll,nvwgf2umx.dll,nvwgf2umx.dll,nvd3dum,nvwgf2um,nvwgf2um
Driver File Version: 9.18.0013.1090 (English)
Driver Version: 9.18.13.1090
DDI Version: 11
Feature Levels: 11.0,10.1,10.0,9.3,9.2,9.1
Driver Model: WDDM 1.2
Graphics Preemption: DMA
Compute Preemption: DMA
Driver Attributes: Final Retail
Driver Date/Size: 12/29/2012 07:34:47, 18054312 bytes
WHQL Logo'd: Yes
WHQL Date Stamp:
Device Identifier: {D7B71E3E-52C0-11CF-B05F-8D061CC2C435}
Vendor ID: 0x10DE
Device ID: 0x1180
SubSys ID: 0x26803842
Revision ID: 0x00A1
Driver Strong Name: oem21.inf:0f066de34a918dd5:Section063:9.18.13.1090:pci\ven_10de&dev_1180
Rank Of Driver: 00E02001
Video Accel: ModeMPEG2_A ModeMPEG2_C ModeVC1_C ModeWMV9_C
DXVA2 Modes: DXVA2_ModeMPEG2_IDCT DXVA2_ModeMPEG2_VLD DXVA2_ModeVC1_VLD DXVA2_ModeVC1_IDCT DXVA2_ModeWMV9_IDCT DXVA2_ModeH264_VLD_NoFGT

DXVA-HD: Supported
DDraw Status: Enabled
D3D Status: Enabled
AGP Status: Enabled

Card name: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
Manufacturer: NVIDIA
Chip type: GeForce GTX 680
DAC type: Integrated RAMDAC
Device Type: Full Device
Device Key: Enum\PCI\VEN_10DE&DEV_1180&SUBSYS_26803842&REV_A1
Display Memory: 4042 MB
Dedicated Memory: 1994 MB
Shared Memory: 2047 MB
Current Mode: 1280 x 1024 (32 bit) (60Hz)
Monitor Name: SyncMaster 732N/732Nplus,SyncMaster Magic CX731N/CX732N
Monitor Model: SyncMaster
Monitor Id: SAM0272
Native Mode: 1280 x 1024(p) (60.020Hz)
Output Type: HD15
Driver Name: nvd3dumx.dll,nvwgf2umx.dll,nvwgf2umx.dll,nvd3dum,nvwgf2um,nvwgf2um
Driver File Version: 9.18.0013.1090 (English)
Driver Version: 9.18.13.1090
DDI Version: 11
Feature Levels: 11.0,10.1,10.0,9.3,9.2,9.1
Driver Model: WDDM 1.2
Graphics Preemption: DMA
Compute Preemption: DMA
Driver Attributes: Final Retail
Driver Date/Size: 12/29/2012 07:34:47, 18054312 bytes
WHQL Logo'd: Yes
WHQL Date Stamp:
Device Identifier: {D7B71E3E-52C0-11CF-B05F-8D061CC2C435}
Vendor ID: 0x10DE
Device ID: 0x1180
SubSys ID: 0x26803842
Revision ID: 0x00A1
Driver Strong Name: oem21.inf:0f066de34a918dd5:Section063:9.18.13.1090:pci\ven_10de&dev_1180
Rank Of Driver: 00E02001
Video Accel: ModeMPEG2_A ModeMPEG2_C ModeVC1_C ModeWMV9_C
DXVA2 Modes: DXVA2_ModeMPEG2_IDCT DXVA2_ModeMPEG2_VLD DXVA2_ModeVC1_VLD DXVA2_ModeVC1_IDCT DXVA2_ModeWMV9_IDCT DXVA2_ModeH264_VLD_NoFGT
D3D9 Overlay: Supported

DXVA-HD: Supported
DDraw Status: Enabled
D3D Status: Enabled
AGP Status: Enabled

^Damn nice PC you got there!

@All: ATI sucks? Really? Haha. With the newest update on their drivers. It improved a lot. LIKE A LOT.

techspot.com/review/603-best-graphics-cards/

I don't have any problems with it either. It has OpenCL which is a lot better than CUDA in terms of video rendering. 25mins video @ 720p renders @ 7mins with i5-2320 + Sapphire HD 6950. I won't bash the new Nvidia cards but I read that the 5xx beats them on rendering.