Search Results

Yep. They wouldn't gain enough attention by attacking someone with less viewers. They came to his house to ask him if he wants to come on their platform to apologize and have his voice heard, which is a clear sign that the original article was just bait. Pure lies, to force Pewds onto their sh1t publication to defend himself. They don't understand he already has a much bigger platform on youtube, a much larger audience. They called him a racist, not because it's true, but because people don't li…

Well said Olia! The everyday normal person who's a content creator on social media has now become the TARGET of media's attacks. They are not attacking Pewds as a comedian who made a controversial joke, they are attacking him in person by accusing him of being something he's not. That's a difference: People can disagree with jokes, but still not lie about the other person's intentions. A bad joke doesn't turn the good man into a bad man, it makes him a good man who told a bad joke. It's clear wh…

This is how I understand the latest scandal. Felix portrays a character: He takes the role of a bad guy so his audience can laugh and ridicule that character. He does a bad Hitler impersonation so that people can ridicule Hitler and the ideas he represents. This is simple classic comedy, delivered with classic comedic tools. Another example of this is how Felix is known for portraying himself as a comically exaggerated online persona: he portrays Pewdiepie to be a selfish, arrogant rich bastard …